Governor Gavin Newsom has signed California’s “click to cancel” Assembly Bill 286 into law to make it easier for consumers to opt out of subscriptions. The bill, introduced in April 2024, forces companies that permit online or in-app sign-ups to allow for online or in-app unsubscribing as well.

"AB 2863 is the most comprehensive ‘Click to Cancel’ legislation in the nation, ensuring Californians can cancel unwanted automatic subscription renewals just as easily as they signed up — with just a click or two,” said California Assemblymember Pilar Schiavo.

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s literally how the government was designed though. Do you believe that there should be a Constitutional amendment to protect porn and ease of subscription cancellation? I agree that the system is flawed, but a win here deserves to be celebrated even though there was a loss somewhere else.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is the company in question national or local to CA only? This is the defining line for laws like this. If a company cannot be distinguished from the services it provides in CA vs any other state then the laws of one state should influence all others since the company is not different between states. Unless they create a different website for each state then they will have a hard time verifying if a user really is from CA and be able to apply the law.

      I could be visiting CA and sign up for something while there. My address is not CA, my billing address is not CA, I could be using a VPN connected to my home. But I am physically in CA and signed up for Planet fitness online. Now whose laws protect me? CA or my home state?

    • pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is a constitutional amendment that protects porn though. The first. What’s changed in Texas isn’t porn’s legality, but restrictions on distribution (though yes, Texas’s law is useless and completely misunderstands the internet’s dynamics)

      • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sarcasm is not lended to text very well. Can you understand that a state that makes a good law is a good thing and that nuance exists.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          2 months ago

          Please give me the nuance where a click to cancel law makes sense in California and not in all 49 other states.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because there is no such nuance. This should be a federal law. It isn’t because the federal government has been too weakened by Republicans over decades. Which was my point.

              • Cataphract
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve been online for like 30 minutes and every post I’m going into has you arguing with someone. Are you doing alright today?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  2 months ago
                  1. That’s not true, just look at my post history.

                  2. If I believed for a second you actually cared how I was doing, we might discuss it. But I don’t.

                  • Cataphract
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    2 months ago
                    1. just anecdotal, like I said from posts I’m viewing, I won’t pick apart your post history for an opportunity for you to argue more :P
                    2. K, I was attempting to care but it doesn’t matter. Trying to create a more positive perspective of you to myself (since you’re so prevalent around here) and I see that I’ve failed lol
            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              You didn’t provide any context. You’ve just named a federal program that has nothing to do with this law, which is about automatic subscription renewals. You certainly haven’t explained why being able to click to cancel such a program is a good thing in California and a bad thing in all 49 other states.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t know why you’re being downvoted because it’s true. California signing this into law is great, I do hope this can reach the federal level though.

        • cheddar@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d guess they are being downvoted because they started an absolutely meaningless argument, and now keep dragging it on.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            100% par for the course with that commenter too. It’s an absolute waste of time engaging with them.