• g0nz0li0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We must block Donald Trump, which is why we urge Uncommitted voters to vote against him and avoid third-party candidates that could inadvertently boost his chances

    Isn’t this just saying vote for Harris?

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      It’s a way to reframe the argument from a vote FOR a milquetoast candidate, to one AGAINST a would-be Dictator.

      Know that none of the 3 possible options for voters will immediately stop Israel’s current terror campaign on Palestinians and the Lebanese.

      Instead, all it does is set up the future environment and Government whom you can influence the actions of. Only ONE option provides an opportunity which could reign Israel back in, and it sure as shit isn’t a possible 2nd Trump administration.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I guess what they’re trying to say is “We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn’t represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that’s the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome.”

        But if that’s so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, but I imagine the roundabout is to maintain pressure.

      I want Kamala to win but I also want her to fix the fucking gaza problem, and she can’t be allowed to forget that.