Did I say mandatory? I meant optional! You’re “free” to die in a cardboard box under a freeway as a market capitalist scarecrow warning to the other ants so they keep showing up to make us more!

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The entire market can go down. There’s no offsetting when your total value is down.

    The tax could also be structured so that it only applies when borrowing against the gains

    That’s fine and completely different from paying a tax on something when it has gone up but not getting the money back when it goes down.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If your total value is down, you aren’t going to be able to borrow against the gains, anyway. So no taxable event.

      Let’s be clear, this is a loophole that rich people take advantage of to avoid paying taxes on income. By borrowing instead of selling, they get the profit without incurring a taxable event. It’s one of many ways capitalists siphon profit from the system while providing nothing in return.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This isn’t about borrowing against assets. I’m fine if that’s taxable.

        This is about holding a stock and paying tax just for owning it despite it might be worthless when you go to sell it.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          But you can already deduct losses from your taxes, up to $3,000 per year and if you have more than that, you can carry it forward. If it’s worthless when you sell, you can deduct all of the loss from your taxes.