• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Funny how those cities still stand after 7 years of shelling. Meanwhile there are several Ukrainian cities that simply don’t exist anymore but we’ll only see you criticizing Ukraine.

    Also I love how you say “government cracked down on resistance” as if that wasn’t part of euromaidan first. They cracked down on pro EU protesters first. Then you gesture broadly at the ~30% who didn’t support joining the EU or didn’t care as if that’s some sort of justification for a Russian invasion of Eastern Ukraine. Which happened in 2014. That led to the fighting in those regions that you mentioned.

    • Diva (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      They still stand and the others do not in part because Russia intervened, the ones that have been under siege recently have all been used as military strongholds for quite some time. They’re not civilian centers, the civilians in Donvas didn’t exactly have many options.

      Did you support Serbia keeping it’s territorial integrity against a breakaway region too?

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They still stand and the others do not in part because Russia intervened

        Russia didn’t “intervene,” they started the fight by annexing Crimea and donbas. There have been 3,400 civilian casualties in the donbas region between 2014 and 2021. There have been 35,000 confirmed Ukrainian civilian casualties between the start of the invasion and July 2024. Remind me how Russia is trying to protect people again? And if this really was just about those regions, why not take them and stop? Why is Russia trying to take kyiv?

        Also trying to whatabout about NATO is idiotic. I only referenced the Budapest memorandum. If you want to blame “NATO imperialism” for forcing Russia to invade a soverign country, then I have two questions. Why are there now two more countries in NATO than before the invasion? And do you honestly think NATO would invade a nuclear power? If so, to what end?

        • Diva (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s fine I don’t need to engage further with you

          • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Aight later. Before you go, I already had you tagged as “tankie?” Are you like this for China and best Korea too or just Russia so I can update my tag?

            • Diva (she/her)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m an anarchist, but I have plenty of issues with pretty much every country, I just have too many family and family of friends entangled in this to not want to see peace, regardless of where the lines on the map end up for now. I don’t think there’s anyone who is proposing a truly deescalatory position, across the board and that’s the problem.