As students return to college campuses across the United States, administrators are bracing for a resurgence in activism against the war in Gaza.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I am responding to this comment:

    Protests don’t really work if they’re not disruptive.

    I consider disruption to be a form of harm. It’s not as serious as, for example, physical injury, but it’s still harm. The main form of disruption that the recent protests have engaged in involved trespassing and so it was illegal, but many colleges preferred to address the problem internally rather than calling the police. These new rules are part of the process of addressing the problem internally, and we’re discussing whether or not they do so without infringing on the students’ free speech rights. My point is that preventing the protesters from being disruptive is not an infringement.

    (“Illegal” wouldn’t be the end of the discussion even where the police were called to remove trespassers, because a university’s policy of having the police remove some trespassers but not others could also infringe on free speech rights.)

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Disruption is impossible without causing harm. If you’re not harming me then I can just ignore you and so you have failed to be disruptive.

        Edit: The word “disruption” can be used in other contexts to describe acts that aren’t harmful. For example, a new discovery might be said to disrupt the existing paradigm. My claim is about “disruption” used to describe protest-associated actions like blocking roads, making a lot of noise, or preventing students from going to class.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Gotta love a “free speech absolutist” who thinks that it doesn’t count as free speech if it stops you from walking to the other side of the quad without taking the long way around.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Come now, I don’t believe for an instant that anyone is as fragile as that. Even my nephew who is a young cancer survivor and weathered people who refused to wear masks during the pandemic by wearing his own.