Verify discovered an Android package, “Showcase.apk,” with excessive system privileges, including remote code execution and remote package installation capabilities, on a very large percentage of Pixel devices shipped worldwide since September 2017

The application downloads a configuration file over an unsecure connection and can be manipulated to execute code at the system level

The application retrieves the configuration file from a single US-based, AWS-hosted domain over unsecured HTTP, which leaves the configuration vulnerable and can makes the device vulnerable

Cybercriminals can use vulnerabilities in the app’s infrastructure to execute code or shell commands with system privileges on Android devices to take over devices to perpetrate cybercrime and breaches

Removal of the app is not possible through a user’s standard uninstallation process, and at this time, Google has not offered a patch for the vulnerability

It appears that Showcase.apk is preinstalled in Pixel firmware and included in Google’s OTA image for Pixel devices

Now imagine this happend to a Chinese phone from any manufacturer, may it be Xiaomi, Oneplus or whatever - could you imagine the outcry?

update from GrapheneOS devs explaining that the exploit isn’t as bad as it initially looks https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/112967309987371034

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I mean isn’t the pixel the easiest to swap OS on though. You really should be installing graphene or divestos instantly

  • krolden
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Outcry over what? This isn’t really easily exploitable without full access to the device already and google said theyre removing it from their images.

    iVerify vice president of research Matthias Frielingsdorf points out that while Showcase represents a concerning exposure for Pixel devices, it is turned off by default. This means that an attacker would first need to turn the application on in a target’s device before being able to exploit it. The most straightforward way to do this would involve having physical access to a victim’s phone as well as their system password or another exploitable vulnerability that would allow them to make changes to settings. Google’s Fernandez emphasized this limiting factor as well.

    https://www.wired.com/story/google-android-pixel-showcase-vulnerability/

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You genuinely telling me western media wouldn’t have field day with this if the same thing was found on a phone from a Chinese company?

      • krolden
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        No I’m telling you this is not that big of a deal and any device like this (especially with the stock firmware) you use probably has even more unpatched vulnerabilities.

        Also I didn’t say anything about what the media response would be like, I’m only speaking about the vulnerability itself. Your jump to make this political is just reactionary. Yes theres more attention on vulnerabilities from Chinese company built devices but thats nothing new.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          My whole point was about the double standard applied to US and Chinese tech. You were specifically asking what the outcry would be over, and you yourself admit that there would indeed be outcry in the west if it was a Chinese company. The fact that you don’t get the political angle here is entirely a you problem.