The ICJ’s authoritative ruling on the Israeli occupation makes clear that boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israeli occupation, colonization, and apartheid are not only a moral imperative but also a legal obligation.
Unfortunately this ruling is non-binding, meaning it can’t be enforced, but it lends strong argument when things need to be argued in eg bourgeois courts and governments. And the international law this ruling is based on is binding and enforceable. So the ruling could make it easier to overturn the anti-BDS laws but doesnt automatically do so
Unfortunately this ruling is non-binding, meaning it can’t be enforced, but it lends strong argument when things need to be argued in eg bourgeois courts and governments. And the international law this ruling is based on is binding and enforceable. So the ruling could make it easier to overturn the anti-BDS laws but doesnt automatically do so