• adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    so, basically, the os isn’t tuned for the new chips yet.

    the 2nd threads on smt-enabled cores are supposed to get hit last.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s an easy fix, sure.

      But there are 3 manufacturers for them to schedule for. It should be ready way before anything ships.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There should be no need for tuning, tweaking, or optimizing on functionality this basic.

      If you ask the processor, it will spit out a graph like this telling you what threads/cores share resources, all the way up to (on large or server platforms) some RAM or PCIe slots being closer to certain groups of cores.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For values of “new chips” that include 20 year old ones. Foster was released 2001, the chips were single-core but you could have up to eight on a board so it’s still multi-core SMT. First on-die multi-core SMT seemed to have been Paxville, 2005.

      Or maybe Windows server has a proper scheduler and they never bothered bringing it to desktops?