- cross-posted to:
- globalsouth
- cross-posted to:
- globalsouth
Mali announced Sunday that it is cutting off diplomatic relations with Ukraine following an admission of Ukrainian involvement in a recent deadly terrorist attack in the West African country.
“The transitional government of the Republic of Mali has learned, with deep shock, of the subversive remarks by which Mr. Andriy Yusov, the spokesperson for the Ukrainian military intelligence agency, has admitted Ukraine’s involvement in a cowardly, treacherous and barbaric attack by armed terrorist groups which resulted in the deaths of elements of the Malian defense and security forces in Tinzaouaten, as well as material damage,” said government spokesman Colonel Abdoulaye Maiga in a statement.
The Malian army admitted on Monday a high death toll following clashes in Tinzaouaten in the north of the country, while the Russian-affiliated Wagner Group supporting the Malian army had confirmed Russian losses and the death of a commander following heavy fighting there.
The comments were reinforced by Yurii Pyvovarov, Ukraine’s ambassador to Senegal, who openly and unequivocally displayed his country’s support for international terrorism, particularly in Mali, according to Maiga.
Maiga said Ukrainian officials have done worse by announcing that there are “more results to come.”
“These extremely serious accusations, which have not been denied, show the Ukrainian government’s official support for terrorism in Africa, in the Sahel, and more specifically in Mali,” he declared.
The remarks by Yusov and Pyvovarov “constitute acts of terrorism and an apology for terrorism,” he added.
The Malian government has therefore decided to break off diplomatic relations immediately, to refer the matter to the competent judicial authorities, and to take the necessary measures to prevent any destabilization of Mali from African states, in particular from Ukrainian embassies in the sub-region, by terrorists disguised as diplomats, and to formally alert regional and international bodies as well as states that support Ukraine to the fact that this country has openly and publicly displayed its support for terrorism.
Mali considers support for Ukraine “as support for international terrorism” and an aggression which is part of "the broader pattern of certain actors who actively support and instrumentalize terrorist groups in the region.”
You must log in or register to comment.
Russia lost a bunch of Wagner troops in an attack in Africa, so might as well blame Ukraine? 🤔
You doubt that Nazi Ukraine did another terrorist attack? Now, in 2024? You need to get up to speed.
What’s really under doubt here is your reading ability and knowledge of geography:
- Ukrainian officials themselves claimed that they’ve provided help to islamists;
- Mali is not region of Russia, it’s a sovereign state on totally different landmass.
Additional coverage:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/5/mali-breaks-off-diplomatic-ties-with-ukraine
https://english.news.cn/20240805/a8a375864882411aa9c97f10de85145f/c.html
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/04/africa/mali-ukraine-wagner-intelligence-intl-latam/index.html
But Wagner is now openly a branch of the Russian military. So why would this be an attack to Mali?
Because it was on Malian soil against Malian military assets that happened to be housing Wagner assets and personnel. You’d think if Ukraine wanted to attack Russia it wouldn’t do so in Mali but instead shore up its failing front line.
We are forced to conclude that Ukraine is spending resources to attack Mali for the same reason Russia is in Mali - because the USA has an interest there. Russia is trying to disrupt that interest and Ukraine is trying to support that interest like the puppet they are.
While at it, there are also Ukrainians volunteering to kill women and children in Gaza instead of fighting Russians in their country.
Something seriously wrong here.
Can you please provide some reliable sources for those claims?
Those are mercenaries, not volunteers. Mercenaries will fight for money and for who pays most. They won’t be generally motivated by high ideals. That type of person, no matter which nationality, won’t fight for their country because it doesn’t pay. Within this context, your original comment is highly misleading IMO.
Malian soldiers were killed. Are you calling the Malian soldiers who were killed in Mali mercenaries?
No. Why would I? The question makes no sense.
Mali considers attacks on Wagner mercenaries terrorism? I thought that was just regular warfare.
It’s revealing that you care so much about white mercs from Wagner but totally ignore casualties of black Malian troops killed by local AlQaeda branch with support of Ukraine. Seems like it’s impossible to be supportive towards Ukraine without being at least a bit racist.
Seems like it’s impossible to be supportive towards Ukraine without being at least a bit racist.
I thought it was a prerequisite. Western media made it clear.
How do you figure that?
I and a lot of people here support Ukraine and reject Israels actions in Palestine. But those two cases are also entirely different in a lot of ways, not just the ethnicity of the relevant people.
How are they different?
And to intercept the possibility of claiming that Hamas started it, here’s an article that explains the lies behind the 1967 war that lead to the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights. People living under an illegal occupation have the right to resist by force if necessary.
That background you’re referring to is what’s different. The middle east was never part of the Soviet Union, nor was Ukraine claimed by zionist Holocaust displaced Jews.
Didn’t know about the collateral damage. Would you be okay with it if it was only the Russian soldiers?
