Lanusensei87@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoNew tech discoveredlemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up11.62Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imageNew tech discoveredlemmy.worldLanusensei87@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down2·5 months agoYeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”. The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging. But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT
minus-squareel_abuelo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 months agoIs it just me or is this a really weird way of repeating what the OP said? He even used the duck emoji for clarity…
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
Yeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”.
The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging.
But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT
Is it just me or is this a really weird way of repeating what the OP said? He even used the duck emoji for clarity…
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod