• Banana_man@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t understand what the image is depicting exactly, there’s one black person in the picture and she’s sitting there while that guy is about to drip something on the head of the woman next to her?

    Is it a picture of white people bullying a group for having a black friend?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, the white guy covered in dessert is presumably an ally there to show solidarity and, judging by the size of him, also physically protect them if necessary.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lunch counters were segregated in the US. A fairly common protest was black folk sitting at lunch counters and trying to order lunch. This often causes uproar and unrest, riots. I believe the woman who’s about to have water poured on her head is black, it’s just that the picture makes her look white, or she’s fairly passing.

      • jettrscga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think the woman with water poured on her is white and sitting with the black woman.

        My understanding of the two sides were the white people attacking them and the white people sitting with a black person to protest segregation.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          IMO that’s why it’s 3 sides.

          The first side is the black people who want to be able to sit at the same counter as other people and order lunch.

          The second side is the white people who want to keep the apartheid system in place.

          The third side is the white people who were willing to take the abuse in order to be allies to the black people who were facing the discrimination.

          To me, the allies are a different group. They are putting themselves in harm’s way for an abstract principle.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a sit in, protesting laws that said establishments could refuse to serve black people (or serve them horribly,)

      This was the form civil disobedience took, where they would go, make a scene, get arrested, and then argue in court that the law was unjust.