• deejay4am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We don’t know who struck first - us, or them - but, we do know it was us who blocked out the sun…”

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just sounds like a bad idea. Especially if its the “release trillions of particles” approach.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone you seriously and unironical think about blocking out the sun needs to be removed from office and the public immediately.

    • coolin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Blocking out the sun with aerosols is a good idea if you know with high confidence how it will impact the climate system and environment. That’s why they’re trying to simulate it with the supercomputer, so they know if it fucks stuff up or not.

    • suoko@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t even believe this is a serious article, it sounds like a Simpson’s episode plot. Let’s ask sunglasses manufacturers to protest so that we prevent this plan (I’m Matt Groening)

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You got a better idea? Earth is cooking, convincing everybody to stop burning fossil fuel is not working, and we’re out of time.

    • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Industry gives off greenhouse gasses that cause more sunlight to be trapped. It also gives off aerosols that reflect the light before it gets there, but those are in lesser amounts. This proposal is to release more of those aerosols into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of global warming. “Blocking out the sun” is just a clickbait headline. Read the article.

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This reads as a start of a prologue to a postapocalyptic story.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they get it wrong, yeah.

      But not doing something like this is also most likely going to serve as the prologue to an apocalypse. Desperate times call for desperate measures…

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, if it would work perfectly sure. And agreed with the desperate times. But they’d need to be absolutely aure it will work and without side effects

  • tsuica
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “So the leaders of men conceived of their most desperate strategy yet. A final solution: the destruction of the sky.” - Animatrix, The Second Renaissance

  • Djoot@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally how SnowPiercer started, and I am all for it, train based survival here we go!

  • Fuck Yankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Listen, this sun… whatever the hell it thinks it is, is coming to ruin your life. Now I propose you not only subsidize building the sun blocker, but also pay us monthly fees afterwards to prevent this sinful ball of devilish fire from ruining your life…”

    Some board room somewhere, probably…