• MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If this somehow works, good on Microsoft, but what the fuck are they doing on boot cycles 2-14? Can they be configured to do it in maybe 5? 3? Some computers have very long boot cycles.

    • vinniep@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s nothing magical about the 15th reboot - Crowdstrike runs an update check during the boot process, and depending on your setup and network speeds, it can often take multiple reboots for that update to get picked up and applied. If it fails to apply the update before the boot cycle hits the point that crashes, you just have to try again.

      One thing that can help, if anyone reads this and is having this problem, is to hard wire the machine to the network. Wifi is enabled later in the startup sequence which leaves little (or no) time for the update to get picked up an applied before the boot crashes. The wired network stack starts up much earlier in the cycle and will maximize the odds of the fix getting applied in time.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        That makes sense with how the article said “up to 15 times” which does sort of indicate it’s not a counter or strictly controllable process. Thank you!

      • EtzBetz@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I was thinking (from reading the headline) that if one specific component fails 15 times during boot or so, it will just automatically get disabled by the system, so that you don’t run into an unavoidable boot loop.

        But this makes sense as well, if they did write “up to” in the article (as others have stated). Even though I find the confidence weird. Imagine you have some weird dial-up or satellite internet solution for your system, which just needs time to connect, and then maybe also just provide a few bytes/kilobytes per second. This must be rare, but I’m 100% confident that there exists a system like this :D

        Edit: okay, I should read first. The 15 times thing is said for azure machines.

        • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          macOS has something to this effect where if it detects too many kernel panics in a row on boot it will disable all kernel extensions on the next reboot and it pops up a message explaining this. I’ve had this happen to me when my GPU was slowly dying. It eventually did bite the dust on me, but it did let me get into the system a few times to get what I needed before it was kaput.

    • azerial@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just imagine if it’s a build farm with hundreds of machines. Jesus. That’s a hell I wouldn’t even wish on my worst enemy.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

    Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

      • EtzBetz@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hey I rebooted 14 times now, just as you told me, but it’s still not working.*

        :D

    • Kissaki@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      No no.

      Have you tried turning it off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on again?

  • 30p87@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well in the time until Windows rebooted 15 times Windows 12 will be out.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    We did get 7 computers back by 1am last night just by constantly rebooting.

    That said, 40 out of 47 never came back. So clearly something more is needed.

  • gwindli@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    there’s an easy fix. it could be done with a single boot attempt if M$ hadnt made it so needlessly difficult to enter safe mode

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.

      • gwindli@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        fair enough. i can see that disabling safe mode would be a decent security measure. but by the time that kind of exploit is used, you’ve already got bad actors inside your network and there are much easier methods available to pivot to other devices and accounts.

          • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well then obviously you could opt to restrict safe mode on laptops only, or laptops and desktops allowing you to get your server infrastructure up quickly so at least the back end is running properly.

            Ffs.

            • jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Servers with KVM access, could have it compromised, letting bad actors enter safe mode.

                • jarfil@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Doesn’t need to be fully compromised, but it isn’t unusual for the access credentials to some portion, to be stored on an easier to compromise system. Disabling safe mode on a server, prevents stuff like a single compromised laptop, from becoming a full server compromise.

  • Jimmybander@champserver.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Most of our machines at my office run Win 10 or 11 and we haven’t had the blue screen. I was wondering why we hadn’t experienced this. Still don’t know.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why bother encrypting passwords? Just store them in plaintext, preferably on a web server that’s publicly accessible so other services can easily access them.