the $80 billion start-up

lol, can you still call that start-up?

I don’t think “Don’t feed the trolls” [alone] is a solution on a public internet forum with changing people. New trolls will come anyway. Some people will always sometimes engage. And if the trolls continue, even without responses, it sets a mood in discussions and threads that influences people whether they engage or not.

Thanking the wood after a good swing.

From tee to tree.

Right now it’s entirely timestamp-based. That means it can interface and work on simple playback terms. On time, jump, jump to time, etc. Having to get frame data and hash it, and make playback depend on it adds a lot of technical complexity.

If ad length varies you don’t even know how far to jump ahead. And if you haven’t prebuffered the data until after the ad, you can’t find out from a hashed after-frame-hash-value either.

The troll followed them around. I don’t see how you can walk away when they are following you.

What do you mean by “where we are now”?

Who?

I choose to think the opposite: Dogs act like these snails.

ensures we can continue to do shows like the one we just did.

Doing shows, not creating games /s(?)

Are they gonna pay them out? /s

Every employee could create their own companies and products. Opportunities and diversification!

Alternatively, each and every one of them can make 101 millionaires and still be a millionaire themselves!

Only 250 €? That’s not expensive/overpriced for the product. And far from the 700$ mentioned by a comment.

When I looked on DE Amazon I didn’t find any.

If you read more of the ruling, the ruling allows EU nations to impose requirements on ISPs. So the storage duration would be up to national law. (Which of course one may call into question bring before court on whether they are too long.)

The question of whether you are liable as a provider of open access is an independent question. Yes, it becomes more relevant if you as a provider can’t bet on anonymity anymore. But it’s independent.

Looking at DE Wikipedia, looks like previous EU court rulings were dismissing being held accountable, but there’s still one open. German law freed it in 2018. No mention of EU specifically in this article, so maybe it’s national concern - at least until the EU court makes a ruling.

Their description reads

I made a moving digital card of Blue Archive Mika using two flexible OLED displays.

As a bonus, I made it possible to switch between the ones I made in the past. Prototype

One commenter says you can buy these kinds of displays on Amazon. Another responds AliExpress. Another reply says

650 USD for just one display. Did I read that right?

So they’re not exactly inexpensive. Which is, of course, not unexpected, given it’s a new kind of product, relatively recent tech.

From the article-linked ruling press release - what it means in practice, what this was about:

In order to protect works covered by copyright or related rights against offences committed on the internet, a French decree introduced two personal data processing operations. The first operation consists of the collection, by rightholder organisations, of IP addresses which appear to have been used on peer-to-peer websites to commit such offences and the referral of those IP addresses to the Haute Autorité pour la diffusion des œuvres et la protection des droits sur internet (High Authority for the dissemination of works and the protection of rights on the Internet) (Hadopi) 1. The second operation, carried out by the internet access providers at Hadopi’s request, consists, inter alia, of matching the IP address with the civil identity data of its holder. Those data processing operations enable Hadopi to initiate a procedure against the persons identified, combining educational and punitive measures, which may lead to a referral to the public prosecution service in the most serious cases.

I find the ruling press release is much more understandable (and much more informative) than the OP-linked article.

How did you come to the interpretation that protection of anonymity were violating copyright?

How do you mean anonymity could give better control over copyrightable information?

oh god, would suck if it’s another broken Lemmy release

I had other formatting problems with HTML inside code blocks being removed and bleeding out of them generating other closing tags. Maybe that was also related.

Will they recall Recall?

Interesting. It also made me look at the MDN docs again. img alt is consistent to that. I wasn’t aware of the empty for omittable images.

I also looked at figure again, and in my interpretation it does declare that figcaption is to be used.

figure represents self-contained content. figcaption provides the accessible name for the parent. The accessible name is is the text associated with an HTML element that provides users of assistive technology with a label for the element.

The resolution order being aria-labelledby, aria-label, input[type=button][value], input[type=image]|img|area[alt], …

So figcaption takes priority over img alt.

Given that it’s not in the comment source I doubt it’s a browser issue. But if you can see it… wtf

When I open the comment in your original instance context it’s there. Your comment was edited. Did you edit it in? I guess it got lost between instance communication lol.

I don’t see a link. Post content source is empty too.

screenshot 1

screenshot 2