Flying Squid@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-27 bulan yang laluYSK there is a massive Google Doc of U.S. gynecologists that will tie your tubes without asking about your kids, marital status or age.docs.google.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eepublichealth@mander.xyz
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1external-linkYSK there is a massive Google Doc of U.S. gynecologists that will tie your tubes without asking about your kids, marital status or age.docs.google.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-27 bulan yang lalumessage-square126fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eepublichealth@mander.xyz
Over half of women who have had abortions have had a previous child. https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2007/05/repeat-abortion-repeat-unintended-pregnancy-repeated-and-misguided-government-policies
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down8·7 bulan yang laluI’d like to see how many people who have abortions later on choose to have a child. I think the “what if” logic for not having an abortions should also be applied to when having an abortion.
minus-squarebitcrafter@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·7 bulan yang laluChoosing to have a child later on generally has fewer negative consequences than unchoosing a child you have already had.
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·7 bulan yang laluMany abortions are also due to miscarriages, a child is wanted but that pregnancy was not viable, while later ones are. Which is why even discussing the idea of these nonsense data points is useless.
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 bulan yang laluRight. People use the “what if” as an excuse to ban abortions. But they don’t realize their logic can and should be used both ways.
minus-squareBaggins [he/him]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 bulan yang laludeleted by creator
minus-squarebraxy29@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 bulan yang lalumore than you’d think, i’m guessing. anyway, what’s it to you? if someone has an abortion and never chooses to have a child, why does that matter to anyone else?
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 bulan yang laluI’m curious about statistics. The post I replied to was about statistics.
I’d like to see how many people who have abortions later on choose to have a child. I think the “what if” logic for not having an abortions should also be applied to when having an abortion.
Choosing to have a child later on generally has fewer negative consequences than unchoosing a child you have already had.
Many abortions are also due to miscarriages, a child is wanted but that pregnancy was not viable, while later ones are.
Which is why even discussing the idea of these nonsense data points is useless.
Right. People use the “what if” as an excuse to ban abortions. But they don’t realize their logic can and should be used both ways.
deleted by creator
more than you’d think, i’m guessing.
anyway, what’s it to you? if someone has an abortion and never chooses to have a child, why does that matter to anyone else?
I’m curious about statistics. The post I replied to was about statistics.