• Elon_Musk [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Congress should clarify that the “regular rate” for overtime pay is based on the salary paid rather than all benefits provided. This would enable employers to offer additional benefits to employees without fear that those benefits would dramatically increase overtime pay”

    I don’t understand this one. I’ve never heard of anyone making OT on benefits.

    • 0x0520 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s a rule the DoL issued in 2019 to “clarify” the prior FLSA regulations. I’ve also never heard of getting OT on benefits and I doubt there was any real confusion. Whether its good policy, I dunno. It’s plausible to me that including non-cash compensation in overtime would disincentive benefits in a way that left the worker worse off, but, ya know, maybe healthcare and retirement shouldn’t be contingent on one’s employer.

      Anyway, this is the Heritage Foundation trying to convert that rule to a law.

      • bestmiaou@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        from what that link says, it sounds like the rule was made mostly to get around employers saying “this part of your paycheck is a bonus, not a wage, so it’s exempt from the time and a half rule”