• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    At a range, sure. At home, sure. On the street, sure.

    On a movie set, with someone who’s entire job it is to make sure this shit doesn’t happen handing it to you? No

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      The friction is that Alec is not just an actor on that set, he’s also a producer so he has extra responsibilities.

      But in that case, the cops and prosecutors fucked up and the judge has taken the right course of action as prescribed by the courts.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Producers should have zero input on this. “I put money into this film. I insist on being allowed to play with every firearm on set” is patently stupid.

        Their responsibilities begin and end with ensuring that people have been hired to be responsible for that. They did. Those people were (in my opinion) criminally negligent. But (if memory serves) the AD almost immediately turned and begged for a deal and the armorer makes the average gravy seal look intelligent. Which, like most of these tragic and pointless deaths, speaks more toward industry wide accreditation and vetting processes.

        Because, again, just because someone has money doesn’t mean they understand gun safety. And the last thing we want is someone who played Call of Duty while getting a blowie last night insisting they know better.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think the only nuance I would make is that the investigation should determine if Alec Baldwin, the producer, did his due diligence with the responsibilities that he has on set.

          I did not follow the trial, so I don’t know what has been done in this case.

      • ipkpjersi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        The friction is that Alec is not just an actor on that set, he’s also a producer so he has extra responsibilities.

        This is true, but I don’t think it’s a producer’s responsibility to check if a gun is loaded with real ammo or not.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, but there is a point to be debated that if you hire an incompetent person that kills someone on your set, you could face consequences.

          But yes, I agree with you, this isn’t the producer’s job to check if a gun is loaded with real ammo or not.