• mamotromico
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You guys are overestimating gamers capacity to read

    • Tomboymoder [she/her, pup/pup's]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand people who go the Roche route literally just because the choice to get onto it involves Geralt just keeping the elf dudes sword away from him like a dick when Roche shows up out of the blue.

      It just felt like such a weird choice to make to me. Like why should Geralt give a shit? I was just like here have your sword and go fight each other I guess.

        • Tomboymoder [she/her, pup/pup's]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 months ago

          maybe I was already too leftist when I played the game because keeping the sword from the elvish freedom fighter while the dude attacks him just seems petty and dickish and obviously taking a side in the conflict on the side of Roche.

          Geralt has already stated he doesn’t really care about their quarrel, so just giving the dude his sword and let whatever happens happen just seemed like the more neutral (and less assholeish) of a move.

          • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s another trolley problem type thing; if you don’t give him the sword you’re obviously taking a side and just letting him die but you can pretend that you’re not responsible; if you give him the sword you’re in some sense “responsible” for whatever happens next, mainly that one of those two people is probably going to get killed. You’re responsible in either instance, but it’s easier to delude yourself you’re not in the first.

        • Tomboymoder [she/her, pup/pup's]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh you might be right, I think the choice I am thinking of just determines whether the pogrom happens or how it happens??
          Idk it’s been some time since I played, I also remember the choice you are talking about tho.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I remember this pretty weakly. I think the pogrom starts anyway but you have the option to help Iorweth save some people or go to Roche and do nothing.

            • Tomboymoder [she/her, pup/pup's]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think if you side with the Elf guy the public reacts more negatively (some how) and is more violent to the nonhumans in retaliation?
              Maybe cause more humans die in the original fight, idk.

    • peeonyou [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      damn… i never played the 2nd one… the first was fucking amazing and so was the 3rd but when the 2nd came out i didn’t have a computer that could play it and so i just forgot about it