A report for the Pentagon was released by Arlington, Virginia-based Govini, which in 2019 received a five-year, $400 million contract from the Pentagon to provide data, analysis and information on Department of Defense spending, supply chain and acquisitions.

The report also states that dependence on the Chinese supply chain is present on every major weapons platform, including US aircraft carriers.

It is separately noted that the current dependence on China cannot be resolved even in a decade. Because a “supply chain” at this scale is an entire economy, as it is a network of many firms that buy and sell from each other.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2024/01/09/americas-carriers-rely-on-chinese-chips-our-depleted-munitions-too/

  • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    5·
    4 months ago

    I’d argue Iraq, Yugoslavia, and a USSR backed DPRK + a late China were very real powers

    Let’s not pretend the US military isn’t extremely powerful. They can and do win firefights, it’s just the ideological aspect they fall short on

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      7·
      4 months ago

      The US was handed half of Korea after WWII. That war was predetermined, and frankly, half of a ruined Korea + newborn and poor PRC so not qualify as a “peer power” to what was at the time the absolutely undisputed military, industrial, and economic power of the entire world. The only true peers at that time were the USSR and maybe the UK. Also, the US couldn’t win that war. Iraq was a US dependent regional power in the first war and a failed state ruined by sanctions in the second. Also, the US couldn’t win that war. Yugoslavia collapsed primarily due to internal contractions and external squeezing, and the US didn’t put boots on the ground. None of these were in any way peers of the US.

      The US military cannot win. It can only destroy, and so it does not go against enemies with true retaliatory capacity. It especially won’t do so against its own manufacturing base.