Public outrage is mounting in China over allegations that a major state-owned food company has been cutting costs by using the same tankers to carry fuel and cooking oil – without cleaning them in between.

The scandal, which implicates China’s largest grain storage and transport company Sinograin, and private conglomerate Hopefull Grain and Oil Group, has raised concerns of food contamination in a country rocked in recent decades by a string of food and drug safety scares – and evoked harsh criticism from Chinese state media.

It was an “open secret” in the transport industry that the tankers were doing double duty, according to a report in the state-linked outlet Beijing News last week, which alleged that trucks carrying certain fuel or chemical liquids were also used to transport edible liquids such as cooking oil, syrup and soybean oil, without proper cleaning procedures.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Kind of. It depends on how egregious it is. Companies endangering lives by pitting melamine in mile - jail. Foxconn endangering lives by overworking people in work camps - 👨‍🦯

    But I definitely give you that some of the more egregious cases are taken more seriously than in the west.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh, Foxconn again. a) Suicide rates of Foxconn workers match that of Mainland university students (and is way lower than the overall average but that would compare the young often male workers against elderly rural ladies) and b) it’s a Taiwanese company.

      Don’t get me wrong though they’re still awful but they’re not that awful. Also they’re pulling out of China, wages are getting too high.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Suicide rates of Foxconn workers match that of Mainland university students (and is way lower than the overall average but that would compare the young often male workers against elderly rural ladies)

        I like how you think that’s somehow a defense of Foxconn and not showing that it sucks to live in China overall.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Not really. 14 in a year out of 1m employees makes a rate of 1.4/100k let’s see how that number compares to WHO statistics. Armenia has a rate of 1.4 in the 25-34 age range, and it’s the second lowest. China average in that group is 5.9.

          What you’re looking it is the suicide rate of people of a population which thinks it has a future: Students got into university, kids from poor villages made it into Foxconn to make money – yes, minimum wage, but they’re making money. Their alternative would be working on the family farm for much less than that (though including room and board). Or work in construction, a much more physically demanding and dangerous job. There’s not many options in China for rural people.

          There’s a fucking fuckton to criticise about Foxconn not to speak of China or tankies or capitalists in general. This isn’t one of those things. On the contrary, focussing in on a false narrative detracts from actual issues such as worker’s safety, forced overtime, the right-out military company culture, etc. When did you last hear about those things? Did you hear about them, ever? Nah, it’s always the suicides.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’m pretty sure less than 14 people in a year jumped off of Google’s headquarters.

            (Insert virtually any other non-Chinese corporation or factory not located in China in Google’s place.)

            I’m also pretty sure Google didn’t have to install suicide nets.

            • nekandro
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Google isn’t the equivalent to Foxconn. It would be more like Ford or some Detroit automaker.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Google doesn’t have a million employees. It also doesn’t have company barracks, if a google engineer wants to off themselves they’re probably going to do it at home or on the Bay Bridge, not at headquarters. Where you probably can’t open the windows on the upper floors.

              But if you can find suicide rates of google employees – not just on-site, but overall, I’m all ear. You can look at literally any population, it’s never going to be zero.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                It also doesn’t have company barracks

                What? You mean other corporations don’t require their employees to sleep at their jobs?!

                But I’m sure that can’t possibly have anything to do with mental illness leading to suicide, hence all the suicide nets on the buildings of all of those other factories. Oh wait.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  As far as I’m aware it’s not a requirement. They’re there to make money and the company barracks are cheap. Students in the US also aren’t required to live in dormitories, but more often than not they do.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Sorry… are you comparing student dorms with factory barracks? What shithole college did you go to?