• Deflaktor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not even sure why I’m bothering replying to this bot, but guess misinformation should not be left alone

      • It’s not instant it takes a long time until enough confirmations have been done. It’s not even clear how many confirmations are enough.
      • It’s only instant if you use the lightning network. Lightning network is literally a traditional bank transaction mechanism on top of bitcoin. If you are arguing for using lightning transactions, what is the point of bitcoin in the first place?
      • fees are huge and will only increase in the future.
        • Deflaktor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I apologize, it looked like copy pasta.

          You lock up BTC in a lightning channel, you can then send that BTC to anybody via lightning,

          You can not send the BTC to just about anybody. Only to people with whom you have a channel open. If you want to send to anybody you need to hop through other channels using middlemen. That sounds very similar to the function of a bank.

    • khorak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The last time I had to send 30 Euro to someone, I had to pay 5 Euro for gas fees. It used to be even worse. Your statements are bullshit, we all know what the usual use cases are (other than speculation)

      • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        5 Euros seems like a pretty standard fee for a Bitcoin transfer, which is insanely cheap for large transfers. Your 30 Euro transaction is more suitable for the lightning network, which handles off-chain transactions for much lower fees. The person you were responding to was specifically talking about the lightning network.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Crypto coins collapsing or people being rugged? Not Bitcoin.

      Bitcoin has collapsed like three times in the last like 7 years dawg.

      But it has a clear use case.

      Sure, I suppose, if you count things like “destroying the environment” and “lining Nvidia’s pockets” as “use cases”.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      it would be nice if the price of bitcoin was stable enough that when I sent $100 to somebody it wouldn’t be a gamble whether what they actually received was double or half that

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t care about amount of BTC, I care about amount of dollars. It may also surprise you to learn that I don’t care about countries where the currency is so unstable that a currency that can double in value in the space of a few months has it beat.

          If bitcoin is going to become usable as a currency, even in niche circles, it has two problems to solve: energy use (three quarters of a megawatt hour per transaction, according to Forbes!) and conversion stability. I don’t want keeping money in my wallet to be a high risk investment.