• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    You’d probably kill millions of people unless you gradually overhauled the farming industry

    • Sightline
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh no better keep poisoning everyone then!

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, yes, but also if I actually had the power to make that change I would do it gradually through a market system for exactly that reason. One can dream, though.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        One small change, Market systems are prone to market failures. They’re also rather inefficient, because there needs to be inefficiencies or else there’s no profit.

        No, the best path to reducing pesticides and the over reliance on fertilizer is regulatory, with people on the ground checking compliance. Our food supply is too important to be left to the inefficiencies and corruption of “market solutions”

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You need to have a role for the market. Central planning is a demonstrably bad idea.

          But a heavily regulated market is the sweet spot.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The sweet spot is in actually testing for, and enforcing regulations. Fund that part properly, and you’re most of the way there. It should also not need to be said that the testing and enforcement cannot be outsourced to some corporation, and cannot be self reported.