• borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    You do realize that someone can rape their spouse/partner right? The article does state that they were romantically involved for a year prior to the rape, so ex would be appropriate here.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      5 months ago

      How are you seriously going to defend a pedophile? He manipulated her into believing she was his girlfriend while she was his child sex slave.

      Quit defending pedophiles.

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Wtf? No I’m not defending anyone, are you serious? I’m just saying that the fucking newspaper headline is accurate and isn’t disparaging/insensitive to the victim in the situation.

        Jesus fucking christ you are primed and ready to fucking go with your outrage. The article didn’t mention anything about the victim being a minor when they met, or about her being groomed. If that’s the case, yeah super fucked up, no shit. I literally opened the article after reading the post I responded to, read it, saw that it said the victim and Epstein were in a consensual relationship, then he raped her a year later.

        If I’m missing context blame the article, not me dude.