• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unenforceable wish: no limit on downvotes, but people should have to EXPLAIN them. I often learn more from opposing opinions than from statements of agreement. If I say something unpopular, I want to know WHY it’s so widely disliked. Maybe I’m unaware of something important.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        lol good point. I’m a goddam genius!

        Ironically, your reply is what I’m talking about. Tell me why I’m wrong! Point out what I missed!

          • magnetosphere@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s ironic because thoughtful criticism is helpful. The “tell me why I’m wrong” bit is a remark meant for others, not you.

    • NauticalNoodle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that sometimes it’s a result of how the voter feels. Other times i’m not so convinced it’s humans voting.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        All this extended conversation about all the downvotes and not a single person responded to the reason I gave for downvoting right up there. Merrick Garland’s DOJ absolutely does not care about politics, and the implication that this guilty plea has to do with the Biden Admin wanting to influence the election in November is fictional.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          As of now 19 folks responded with upvotes. The lack of comments is because you nailed it and nothing else needed to be said.