• Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    Claims he encourages concerned employees to speak up.

    Hasn’t talked to any of the whistleblowers who have spoken up.

    One solution to this logic problem is that the concerned employees he is encouraging to speak up are not the whistleblower but rather the employees raising concerns about whistleblowers.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Claims he encourages concerned employees to speak up.

      So they can know who you are and retaliate.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    But nothing will happen because, as usual, corporations are people right up until the moment they get caught committing a crime.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not surprised to see crickets in the comments on this one. I mean really, what’s the bigger story here: the fact he admitted to that, or that he won’t face any repercussions? I’ll be happy to be proven wrong on that second part, though i don’t expect to see anything actually happen to him over this.