• erwan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    No it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.

    • GolfNovemberUniform
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I still don’t understand. Is it like RHEL (they give you all the source code) or more like Windows?

      • erwan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.

        So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.

          • erwan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            How can you have a preference if you don’t understand?

            • GolfNovemberUniform
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              You didn’t say it’s fully open-source so RISC-V is better no matter how “open” ARM is

              • erwan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 days ago

                Yes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.