The neat thing is, you can add stuff like range checks and logging for getters and setters without changing every call. Separation of concerns is also vital in larger projects.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
The neat thing is, you can add stuff like range checks and logging for getters and setters without changing every call. Separation of concerns is also vital in larger projects.
typical OOP progaganda
also const correctness in languages that support that concept
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
You can, but who ever does?
I suppost that’s why some languages offer autogenerated minimal getter/setters, but that still seems like the same thing with extra steps.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.
Yeah, I need to force myself to do it, cuz it feels so slick and efficient and overall nice. Or am I just dumb and didn’t understand satire of this post.