Probably not but one can hope… to the Fediverse lemmings!

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I suspect these changes come from very different motivations. My guesses are ① Reddit needs money, and ② Twitter engineering has been brain-drained.

    Reddit’s changes are a desperate attempt to please investors. This is a standard tactic for tech startups that are having trouble showing a profit: figure out what the company has been giving out for free, and start charging for it. They looked at API traffic and said “what do we have to do to monetize this?” and the current situation followed directly from that.

    This is not just a vague appeal to “the market”; there are specific big-money investors involved, and they will have been communicating directly with Reddit management on what they want to see from the platform. CEO Huffman is probably listening to specific advice (or demands!) from those investors, and making policy changes to appeal to them.

    Twitter’s situation is quite different. The goal of Musk’s takeover was political: to reverse Twitter’s user conduct policies, which had led to Donald Trump and other fascists being banned from the platform for shitty behavior.

    Twitter is falling apart on a technological level right now because most of its skilled engineers have quit, leaving the company no longer capable of responding effectively to technical problems.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re right about Reddit. I think Spez probably knows the recent changes are too heavy handed, but has been painted into a corner having tried and failed to monetise Reddit “his way” for years.

      Now his investors are forcing change and he either has to see it through or quit. But now users have turned on him he really has nothing left.

    • inode
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree about Twitter. I don’t understand how they intend to be profitable by making sure their users can’t use the website after 600 tweets read. This means less eyes for their advertisers, I would understand limiting within a short period of time like 600 in a half hour but 600 per day is pretty low considering how short tweets are. I can’t imagine they are going to be able to sell many advertisements without the users bothering to see them in case they run out of their daily limit.