• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah imagine seeing something that’s not produced by western propagandists for once in your life

      • Sleepless One
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The usual narrative here in burgerland is that the CCP suppresses information about the incident entirely. The fact that their state media made a whole documentary about it, conflict of interest or not, is already enough to debunk the common western narrative about the event.

          • davelA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            parenti-hands https://redsails.org/anticommunism-and-wonderland/#left-anticommunism

            In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

          • linkhidalgogato
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            does ur brain even work u are commenting in a fucking post where someone as brainrotted as u, said people in China cant talk about it so he provided prove that the Chinese government is wiling to talk about it.