I’m not a lawyer, but my understanding is it would depend on what kind of business you’re in and what kind of services the Christian customers asked for. You could say “I do websites for weddings, but not Christian weddings” for example.
As I understand it, this ruling still wouldn’t necessarily protect broader discrimination like “I own an ice cream shop, but I won’t sell ice cream to certain people”; whether the people you’re refusing to sell to are Christian, gay, etc…
I don’t know, this whole thing is one huge slippery slope. According to the ruling they probably couldn’t stop people from entering the store and such. But it does seem that they’re now empowered to refuse to interact with them. Counter service involves customized and tailored expressive speech.
I’m not a lawyer, but my understanding is it would depend on what kind of business you’re in and what kind of services the Christian customers asked for. You could say “I do websites for weddings, but not Christian weddings” for example.
As I understand it, this ruling still wouldn’t necessarily protect broader discrimination like “I own an ice cream shop, but I won’t sell ice cream to certain people”; whether the people you’re refusing to sell to are Christian, gay, etc…
Thank you. So many people don’t understand what happened and think the Supreme Court made it legal to discriminate against gay people.
I don’t know, this whole thing is one huge slippery slope. According to the ruling they probably couldn’t stop people from entering the store and such. But it does seem that they’re now empowered to refuse to interact with them. Counter service involves customized and tailored expressive speech.