Next article in the framework 16 deep dive posts is out

  • lightrush@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not ecstatic about them using ADATA but I hope QC and good chip selection could eliminate any significant issues.

      • lightrush@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Used to when I was in hardware service and sales, but that was back in 2008-9. We mostly dealt with their flash media at the time such as SD cards. The running joke was, customer asks why are the ADATA cards so cheap, someone answers - there’s 50/50 chance it’ll lose your data. That arose from really high return rates. They’d just die on people randomly. It wasn’t a single batch issue either. They’re probably different today. RAM is hard to screw up too. Just don’t scrape the bottom of the barrel for chips. Yes I know OCZ managed to screw RAM spectacularly, but in this case it sounds like Framework will choose the chips. They’ve mentioned they’ll be using SK Hynix.

        E: Aaah good old OCZ. We used to diagnose random crashes with a single question - “Do you have OCZ RAM?”. If yes, 9 out of 10 times Memtest86+ would confirm bad RAM. At some point we stopped even testing it, just straight replaced the RAM with something sane and the customer never came back till they needed an upgrade. Here’s a receipt from a case where a computer came with a few desoldred chips in an OCZ module. It came apart:

        • OsrsNeedsF2P
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a yikers. Really hoping Framework doesn’t lose their rep over this, I know they do basic QC but that’s only 2 days running random stress programs, i.e. not exactly what you’d want to run on RAM or an SSD