• Altofaltception@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    We keep being reminded that Israel has a right to defend itself, but nobody has ever explained how killing 30,000 civilians, mostly children, helps Israel defend itself.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Someone on reddit said that hamas used young children to attack israel on october 7th and therefore children are not innocent. I shit you not…

    • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      22 days ago

      Was the vietnam war a genocide? The US killed ~600,000 civilians during the Vietnam war.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yes, it pretty clearly was, the fact that they restricted operations to the south out of worry of a Chinese invasion meant that commanders on the ground literally began measuring mission progress entirely by how many Vietnamese people they’d killed in a given period.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            You drug it into this.

            To be clear, discussing the Vietnam war is just fine, and more than that, important. But this isnt that.

            Edit a distinct thread on such a topic is welcome and appropriate.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              21 days ago

              I brought is up because I am unsure where the line of genocide is especially since wars that involve the US tend to have loads of civilian deaths.

              • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                Over 100,000 civilians died in Iraq and Afghanistan during “the war on terror”.

                That’s worth it because of 9/11 tho /s

              • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                The US does a lot of war crimes. They’ve just been historically more powerful than the people who prosecute war crimes.

                • BluesF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  They also aren’t a member of many international legal bodies and thus do not consider themselves bound by international law. Frustratingly, they are basically right - international law is opt-in.

          • Count042
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Any nation that intentionally blockades food, medicine, and potable water to a population it considers inconvenient is a government internally committing genocide.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Indeed and israel has very clearly expressed intent.

          Sbrenica had 8000 people killed and was deemed a Genocide. And the statements there were far less severe than the extreme genocide rhetoric from israel.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Honestly at this point the settlers have fucked everything too much,

    Israel and Palestine should both be disbanded by force, the leadership of both should be transferred at gun point to the Hague, all their militaries, paramilitaries, blackops whatevers need to be disbanded, and the two states need to be reformed into a single confederation who’s military defense is left entirely to an international coalition force that polices the shit out of the place the way the union policed the south after the civil war before Hayes bumble fucked it.

    We’ve tried to solve this problem with recognizing sovereign rights, now it is time to put the fear of god into anyone who would even dream of trying to keep the fight for total domination over the strip going. Sovereignty and defense independence are for the good little children who don’t try to Lebensraum their neighbors with it.

    Coexistence at gunpoint until the settlers are cowed, the Palestinians have their freedom of movement and shelter re-established sufficiently, and the antidemocratic leaders of both sides blatantly chasing war forever to maintain their own power are hung as examples to future would be tyrants and shit stirrers.

    • erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Surely this will not cause religious friction. I can see no flaws with this plan.

      Solving a problem of violence with even greater violence seems to be shortsighted at best, and would probably cause more unforeseen future issues. I’m no expert, but surely there must be some nuanced position in between “cheer them on like a cage match” and “total authoritarian control over two peoples.” It just seems so reactionary and extreme to say “oh just forcibly disarm them and make them be nice to each other. With force.” It won’t cure decades of cultural friction and religious tension, and seems a bad precedent to set. On whose authority would this coalition act? They have the absolute power to dissolve two states? Could they do this to anyone they dislike? Where is the line?

      Obviously you weren’t genuinely proposing this as a real solution, but reactionary takes like that just dilute the discussion and inflame emotions.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Nah, do it the way they did in the immediate reconstruction era south. Lynch mobbers get the rope and their friends and families get to watch.

        • erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Jesus Christ. Take it down a notch, if you want anyone to take you seriously. Perpetuating a cycle of violence leads to lasting resentment and hatred. Sometimes violence is necessary to make voices heard, but that’s from the oppressed against the violence of their oppressors. Violence should never be used to control.

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            It worked in the south, and it’d have kept working too if we hadn’t been dumb enough to let up on their shit.

            Violence is not cyclic inherently, and terrorists are inhuman scum who waste every breath they take, so going full Spartacus over their shit is fully warrantable and highly likely to work.

            Especially with a nice little top off of spacing the effigies to mingle the war criminals amongst each other as they are hand in hand in the oppression of the people.

            Where anyone tries to pick either torch up, crush them, and effigize them all the same. There can be no tolerance for any sort of return to the barbarism we see on display even from before the war.

            You can have any opinion you like, just not supremacism. Supremacists get the rope. Yeah it just keeps going, but for a cause as righteous as reminding supremacists they rightfully ought to fear for their lives under the eyes of decent society, then it is an effort well worth it just keeping on going.

            Fuck the supremacists gonna do? Team up to stop people from stopping the war continuing? That just makes them all the more worthy of final humiliation.

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah… all of his controversies aside, last time I checked he’s a staunch critic of Zionism.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      Unless you count “Hamas is also bad, but created by Israel, also Israel is hard to be undone today” kind of takes a Zionism, which tankies also like to, besides the usual bad faith criticism of him being painted as an unironically evil entity.