• makingStuffForFun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The measurements seem out. It’s this in thee olde worlde imperial system perhaps?

  • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    300dpi is the industry standard baseline for printing, 150dpi is not “excellent” it’s barely usable without pixelation being visible in the print.

    • mondoman712
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Viewing distance is a big factor with regards to the acceptable resolution, which is ignored here.

  • SuperNerd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    The film data is way over ambitious. I don’t think blowing a 35mm negative up to 16x20 is “superb.”

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, all of these values are going to depend on a low ISO. You can have 60+ MP but if you’re shooting at 3200 ISO it’s gonna look shit blown up, less than say 30MP but still your not going to get these numbers.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This chart is very difficult to read for those with color deficiency - about 8% of men. Good and Fair are nearly the same, as well as Better and Superb. It would have been really easy to just use 5 shades of gray, or 5 colors that are distinguishable in greyscale.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do wish smart phone manufacturers were competing to increase the MPs in the cameras because I’d love to be able to get some large prints out of the photos I take. But they just wouldn’t look as sharp as I’d want them.

    And no, I’m not buying a dedicated camera to carry around because I’m not an actual photographer, just a parent taking a bunch of photos of his kids.

    • mondoman712
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just adding megapixels doesn’t give you more resolution, you also need a lens that can resolve the detail which often means a bigger lens.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Cell phone MP can be fake anyway, I have a 48MP one but the fine print is the extra MP are interpolated based on the neighbours so it is basically shitty MP that is algorithmically cleaned up for higher resolution.