• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The court is the highest UN body for hearing disputes between states. Its rulings are final and binding but have been ignored in the past, reports Reuters. The court has no enforcement powers.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      And that’s by design by the Big 5.

      Just like their veto power at the Security Council making sure that they don’t even get to condemn atrocities officially.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s less of a court in the traditional sense, and more of an indicator and shaper of international sentiment.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Was it? Look at Germany or the rest of the EU for example. It would make it much easier to argue for divestments and sanctions in parliaments if there was an active warrant against Bibi.

          • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I guess i meant civilian sentiment and not political sentiment. It seems like there is a gap between these, in this case

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t know how accurate it is, but I seem to see the Right Wing Cinematic Universe being on Israel’s side internationally.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, it’s definitely not going to be enforced but it’s still breaking the Genocide Convention. It basically says that in the future Israel might not comply with international treaties if it doesn’t feel like it. This makes them hard to work with as a country.

      Then there is also bilateral actions such as sanctions as a tool to put pressure.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m sure this will stop them. Israel has nothing but contempt respect for international law.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or else any last semblance of the rules-based international order is out the window.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Eh. The ICJ has zero enforcement authority, and is often very selectively ignored by tons of countries.

        The result of this will be:

        Israel: no.

        ICJ:

        Note that this is not a defense of Israel or an endorsement of the ongoing genocide they’re perpetrating. It’s merely a statement on how the ICJ is effectively toothless.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Genocide Joe will be continued to be voted for and praised by Americans who call themselves “progressive”, “liberal” or believe they have any “values” while politically approving of genocide.

      The sad truth is that the court has no means to enforce its rulings. It relies on governments to be lawful and responsible and on people to demand that of their governments. However the majority of people in countries that still support the genocide are either themselves pro genocide or believe that genocide is in any way acceptable.

      Future generations will look at our generation and consider us in the same category as the German Nazis, their supporters and those ignorant of their crimes.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s our burden for failing to put pressure on primarying him - we should do better next time.

          At this point voting for Biden is, however, the only responsible action.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Except we primary him and we either lose and get blamed for when he loses, or watch our progressive challenger lose because the rest of the country hates him.

            America isn’t nearly as progressive as us Internet weirdos think it is.