the-podcast guy recently linked this essay, its old, but i don’t think its significantly wrong (despite gpt evangelists) also read weizenbaum, libs, for the other side of the coin

  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol @100 percent.

    So which one brain does? Linked list with hash maps then? Final simple computer analogy? Maybe indexed binary tree? Or maybe it’s not that?

    • m532 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      When I want to recall a song, I have to remember one part, and then I can play it in my head. However, I can’t just skip to the end.

      Linked list

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        So if second verse plays you can’t sing along until your brain parses through previous verses? I find it rather hard to believe

        • m532 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just because linked lists are usually implemented with a starting point doesn’t mean they have to. Content + a pointer to the next object is all that’s needed for an element of a linked list. It could even be cyclic.

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        you can try to find 200th word on physical book page, I suspect on first tries you’ll get different answers. It’s not dumbness, with poem it’s rather complicated counting and reciting (and gesturing, if you use hands), and direct count while you are bored (as in with book), might make mind either skip words, or cycle numbers. We aren’t built for counting, fiddling with complicated math is simpler than doing direct and boring count