• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Now I understand. And I just don’t see that as inevitable.

    Private ownership is too important to people individually. Without it, we don’t even have any reason to expect any anything from our labor, since we can’t be said to own even that. There isn’t much room left for personal autonomy, if we don’t have defacto ownership of our bodies, minds, and effort.

    It would require some post-scarcity Star Trek technology to make our labor obsolete. Functionally infinite energy and matter replicators. The technological components would have to be in place, before the social changes become feasible.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s a difference between private ownership and personal ownership. For example, in Marxism, personal property is very much respected. Nobody is coming after your toothbrush or your house. What’s meant by private property is owning enterprises that employ other people to work for you. This is replaced by cooperative ownership where workers own the business collectively.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That may be an option then.
        Still not convinced it’s only way from here, or even the best way. It would depend entirely on the details.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There may be other ways forward, but it’s the one way that’s known to work in practice.