The habit of this court is to rule in favor of whatever they want while trying to claim it’s a limited decision (and even saying to not use the decision as precedent!).
I think that’s the most likely outcome. They’ll say it’s a special case because of some technicality and go forward with it.
Or hell they might just do the usual, “national security trumps all” piece of misdirection I dunno.
The habit of this court is to rule in favor of whatever they want while trying to claim it’s a limited decision (and even saying to not use the decision as precedent!).
I think that’s the most likely outcome. They’ll say it’s a special case because of some technicality and go forward with it.
Or hell they might just do the usual, “national security trumps all” piece of misdirection I dunno.