I bet that rich dumb ass would love this comparison.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What are you on about?!

    Tesla died a poor man 4 years before bell labs created the first transistor.

    The microchip was invented about 15 years after he died.

    Perhaps he would have understood or even created these concepts if he had the funding he probably should have given his remarkable successes and contributions to the entire field of electrical engineering when he was still able to contribute. But unlikely sure. Not why you sre saying these weird things

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why would he have understood those concepts before they were invented just because people gave him money?

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        He was not able to effectively continue to experiment and research. Because he may have worked with some of the people who worked on those projects, or at least had a connection to them, and also he may have lived a hell of a lot longer if he wasnt poor. Its not good for your health

        So if he didnt get screwed over the way he did he would have lived differently.

        Also a concept can exist decades before it is proven.

        Dude had a brilliant mind and was a genius. Money allows you to persue the things you want in a way that being poor simply does not allow.

        Is this really something you needed explained?

        • Tnaeriv@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          And how was Tesla ‘screwed over’ exactly?

          He WAS rich for a long time. He died poor because he lost all the money on his ‘wireless electricity’ idea that noone wanted to fund, because they knew it’s not going to work. Tesla didn’t know that. You know why? Because he sucked ass at physics. That’s also why he would have never understood the concept of a transistor.

          Please stop spreading misinformation about Tesla being some misunderstood genius screwed over by greedy corporations. He was not. He screwed himself over.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I dont believe i am spreading misinformation

            Marconi became rich and famous, the “inventor of the radio.” It didn’t matter that he had been using Tesla’s technology. After Tesla’s death, the Supreme Court would even rule that Tesla had a better claim to the patents — but it was too late.

            His loss in the race for the radio would send Nikola Tesla on a long downward spiral from which he would never recover. Combined with his other failures and his struggles with what we would probably identify today as obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tesla descended into a tailspin at the end of his life.

            My opinion about him getting screwed is this. You will have to show me this is misinformation if you want me to change my mind as believing this is my kyptonite if im wrong. But I havent seen anyone prove this wrong yet.

            You honestly have a chance to change my mind here if you are willing to help me out, but ive put what i consider a reasonable effort into forming my opinion so its now on you to show me the error of my ways and im giving you the spot I think is easiest.

            Ball is in your court friend

            Edit: adding source i quoted from. Fyi its just the first article i found after the above reply to quote with, it is not the only reading that forms my opinion

            • Tnaeriv@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              You kind of stumped me at first, didn’t think you were referencing Marconi. I was almost ready to give in, but then I went looking for that court judgment. I believe it’s this one. Lemme just quote you one fragment of the attached opinion:

              Marconi’s reputation as the man who first achieved successful radio transmission rests on his original patent, which became reissue No. 11,913, and which is not here in question. That reputation, however well deserved, does not entitle him to a patent for every later improvement which he claims in the radio field.

              It seems like this case wasn’t about his original patent whatsoever, only his later claimed improvement to it. Yes, the later one was invalidated, but the original was not. And it also looks like they focus more on patents of Stone and Lodge, only sporadically mentioning Tesla. They even state that wireless communication wasn’t even the primary purpose of the Tesla aparatus, it was actually for his wireless energy stuff, altough he did mention it could be used for that.

              So I stand by my opinion. Marconi didn’t really screw over Tesla, altough it seems he did screw over Stone and Lodge.

              Altough I admit I might be wrong, it’s very hard to look up anything on Tesla and get objective results. Also, after spending an hour reading a 70 year old court case about patent infringment I decided I should probably find something better to do with my time and can’t be fucking bothered anymore.

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You have much better patience than me. Appreciate your efforts friend

                Stay sane out there

                Edit: forgot to say thank you so, thanks for you and the effort you put in here

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          “He was a genius” does not equal “he would have invented something that hadn’t been invented yet if he had the money to do so.”

          Do you even have any evidence that he was working along those lines?

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I said perhaps understand the concept, not invent it. So no i dont have any evidence for something i never claimed.

            Wtf is wrong with you.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Okay, sure. He might have understood the concept of genetics too. But he didn’t, so that’s not relevant.