“Reproducible builds” is a way to ensure that the source code for any software and the binary code resulting from building that source code are matched byte-...
I tried following some of the links to see, but the article isn’t clear as to where these tested packages are from. I’m assuming this is just the regular repos and not the AUR. I’d expect those to have a lower reproducible build rate, being that they’re kinda the wild west of packages.
Ah! It was right there the whole time - I had already skimmed through that page. On a phone at the moment and didn’t notice the table that clearly shows the breakdown by the official repos. My bad!
I tried following some of the links to see, but the article isn’t clear as to where these tested packages are from. I’m assuming this is just the regular repos and not the AUR. I’d expect those to have a lower reproducible build rate, being that they’re kinda the wild west of packages.
Someone else posted this : https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.html
And yes, AUR can imho be seen as an unofficial and not particular endorsed part of Arch Linux :)
Ah! It was right there the whole time - I had already skimmed through that page. On a phone at the moment and didn’t notice the table that clearly shows the breakdown by the official repos. My bad!