• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The last place I worked at sent an email of “congratulations” to the staff for a new annual profit record, and instituted a pay freeze later in the same month because they were trying and eventually did sell to a publically traded company and low payroll looks better in the sale, that proceeded to fire everyone because they were only interested in killing local competition in the market.

    Workers working too hard for the owner literally cost us our jobs.

    The owners have no bravery and take no risks that labor doesn’t bear the biggest brunt of. This entire economy is a scam that stands on pillars of lies/propaganda.

    Side note, who the fuck celebrates their employer making record profits if they aren’t in a super rare in the US cooperative or generous stock dispersment program? The whole point of employment is to provide the least labor for the most reward while they try to get the most labor for the least reward, record profits means I’m working too hard for them.

    AdaptHealth was the national conglomerate that swalllowed us and a hundred other local homecare/dme providers for overt competition slaughter btw. Their whole goal was/is to enshittify home healthcare/dme for private profit, and the original ceo had to step down because he committed tax evasion in a European country that actually gives a shit. If they’re in charge of your grandmother’s homecare/dme, say your goodbyes to grandma and make sure they didn’t triple bill.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh puh-lease!

    Employees don’t risk anything except their career, livelihoods, and homes.

    Investors take enormous risks, like a small amount of their vast wealth, and maybe even risk losing a controlling interest in the board. If they really fuck up, they might even risk not being allowed to be a CEO again for a few years.

    But go on, try to convince me again that employees deserve a bigger share…

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know, it always amazes me how people equate layoffs with losing livelihoods here. Is that how it is in America? Seems so alien, when where I live, being fired (without cause) would be somewhere between a non-event and a pleasant break using the severance pay.

      • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Often, yes. Outside of more senior level white collar careers, severance is often not guaranteed upon separation here. In many states, “Right to Work” labor laws enable an employer to terminate an employee for nearly any reason. To make matters worse, our health insurance is provided as a benefit by our employers, so losing your job not only means you lose your source of income, but also your means of keeping yourself healthy and getting care should you need it.

        And in many cases, even if you do receive severance, the company determines what your separation package includes, and the calculations used to determine the value is kept behind closed doors and obscured from the employee. The packages are presented as non-negotiable, even though they aren’t, and employees being let go are often pressured to sign the agreement in a very short window or risk having the offer of severance rescinded. Often what is offered is a pittance, but generally Americans don’t push back against it. It’s a “better than nothing, I guess” situation.

        So yeah - being laid off is a tremendously stressful and life altering experience here for the vast majority of the working and middle class.

        • Promethiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Smallest of corrections because the bastards are multiple flavors of bastards: ’

          ‘At will employment’ is the "fire you for any or no reason so long as we don’t transparently enough do it for/to the small list of protected reasons or qualifying personal attributes for protected class status.

          The sick joke is that you can terminate your employment ‘At will’ too, unlike those other work contract places isn’t that liberating!

          That one is in all of the US.

          ‘Right to work’ would be the anti-union version which applies to some states that have gone extra harder than the other ones to prevent the evil evil unions. Plenty of folks better suited than me to explain more around Lemmy.

          The sick joke with that one is that you have “the right to work” even when that evil evil union is doing collective bargaining outside with funky signs!

          Person who replied to who I replied to; the list of shit Americans ought to be focusing on legislating for is intentionally multi-faceted and obtuse; do you really think such simple insight beyond what you would consider obvious? Our great thinkers aren’t dumb, they’re oppressed.

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            To double down on the “um actually…”

            Right to work laws guarantee the benefits of a union while also removing the requirement to pay for that union. The goal is to have enough people try to get a free ride with the union that it collapses under it’s own weight.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t think that your great thinkers are dumb. I think they are ignored by the masses. As dumb as your voting system is, it is still a functioning voting system. And yet the only change it seems to bring is what the level of intolerance and hate is in your country.

        • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The packages are presented as non-negotiable, even though they aren’t

          How are they negotiable? What can the employee threat with if they don’t get a better package?

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Really sounds like you should be focusing on having legislated 3 months salary severance like we do instead of thinking about communist revolutions that have zero chance to succeed in the short and medium term (sorry if you don’t think about that, but feels like two thirds of Lemmy do).

          Note that we do have a 3 month probationary period where you can be fired for any reason without severance to ensure employers are not afraid to hire people and often the first employment contract is only for a year so the employer has the option to let you go after a year without severance. An extension has to be indefinite though, so it is like an extended probation.

          Of course, health insurance is paid by the state while you are involuntarily unemployed and you get unemployment benefits for a limited time after being fired (though that may only be after 3 months when the severance runs out, I am not quite sure how exactly that works).

          • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The problem is, is that our legislation system was built with the intention of stability and to make any changes, all sides would have to somewhat agree. At some point it unfortunately has drifted off course and with everyone polarized other over whose side is right or wrong, it became a game of endless tic-tac-toe of keeping the other side from “winning”

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        Depends. I’m an experienced programmer. It has never taken me more than a month of casual searching to land the next gig, no relocation.

        But if you’re a factory worker in bum fuck nowhere, where the factory is the town, well, layoffs are going to be catastrophic for most, particularly since relocating would almost certainly be to a more expensive area.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The shareholders could go poor while labor gets all the money and I still won’t be happy. The shareholders have more power than the workers. Fixing wealth doesn’t magically summon democracy and fix power imbalances.

    Power imbalance is the sickness, wealth inequality is a symptom.

    All companies need to be owned by their workers.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      this is also true for customers - imo customers also need a stake in businesses especially ones that have anything approaching a monopoly.

      The obvious solution would be a law that any company of a certain size should have 25% of its board nominated and elected by non managerial workers and 25% appointed by public election or appointed by an elected official.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      the workers can be shareholders though. some companies even pay a bit in stock or options. however, dividends are usually very low and most shareholders make their money with gambling the stock market, which has little to do with labor at all.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure but giving employees a tiny fraction of the company is not democracy. All workers must collectively own the company. And nobody who doesn’t work there should get a say.

        Also the whole thing I just said, it’s not about wealth it’s fundamentally about power.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still mad that a coworker got fired because a different, unrelated department lost a sale. Sales keeps their bonuses but socialized their loss. Fuck them.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Last month we had our AGM where they announced record profits, like our company has literally never done better. Just in the difference in profits from last year they could give every employee in the company a $15k bonus.

    Then a week later we had a department meeting where they announced 6 people being made redundant as part of a larger wave of lay-off to “keep the company competitive in a challenging market”

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only thing that’s challenging to them is showing some courage when investors ask them what they’re doing to increase profit margins

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It should be illegal to do layoffs or pay freezes to save money unless the CEO’s compensation is at or below a threshold set proportionally to the lowest paid employee.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds good, until you realize this just encourages them to do a bunch of “for cause” firings before the mass layoff.