• RuthlessCriticism [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    He is a not a Marxist in any meaningful way. His economics is Keynsian/MMT. If in light of all evidence, you still rejected the labor theory of value you have no right to call yourself Marxist.

    • novibe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      He is an economist working within the bourgeois state apparatus. If you don’t think pushing MMT/neo-Keynesian economics in that position is a good idea, not sure what to tell you. If you read and listen to him enough, you’ll see he understands and thinks very much like a radical Marxist. But the framework he has agency in allows for very little, and he tries to push as far left as possible imo. While also agitating for radicalism outside of that framework, with his books, talks, appearances etc.

      • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can think that he does good with his platforms and appearances and whatnot, that’s a seperate thing. But simply put, if he pushes Keynesianism he is not a Marxist and that’s that.