• Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    anything on ‘the use of any tactical nuclear weapon’ or ‘the destruction of a nuclear facility’, what with that being what the conversation is about and all

    • TomHardy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      …, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory…

      This you left out on purpose?

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an “immediate response”, and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions

        thats why it says “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

        as opposed to “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

        so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says

        • TomHardy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          what? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t