• DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    I find this quite interesting. For a liberal, “Facts” are indisputable things they agree with, and anyone who honestly disagrees with them is always just “misinformed” and refuses to accept the “Facts.” There’s no discussion of a topic, no understanding, no nuance, no contextualisation, there are “facts” and there is “disinformation” and if you aren’t on team liberal, you are automatically being pumped full of disinformation by nefarious third parties.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      They certainly ignore inconvenient facts. Just tonight Chris Hayes mentioned the “draconian abortion bill in Arizona” and he said “The Democrats want to Restore Roe” but he conveniently didn’t explain how they would actually accomplish that in the real world. He might as well and the payrolls of the DNC and DCCC and getting fat checks from them.

      As far as I’m concerned - even though it involves potential future situations - it’s a fact that after the election if the dems are in power - the first step in restoring Roe must be some kind of radical judicial overhaul before they pass a “Restore Roe” law. If the dems don’t do that overhaul first but pass a law anyway - the GOP justices will simply say the law is unconstitutional.

      But libs keep lying to themselves, lying to each other, and lying to the world that there’s some kind of magic where “Restoring Roe” can happen without the overhaul. It drives me insane.

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        They certainly ignore inconvenient facts.

        Inconvienient facts aren’t Capital F “Facts” though, they’re disinformation. It’s a binary, it either supports their worldview (and is therefore a Fact) or it doesn’t (and is therefore disinformation).

        And they smugly love to tell us how misinformed we are because we try to understand all the relevant information, not just the parts that we already agree with.

        • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          The only big right-wing account I know of at Bluesky is Tom Nichols. He has 22k followers because he’s an anti-Trump guy who has appeared on MSNBC. Despite having a surprisingly large number of followers at a lib site - I was amused to see that he also has ~1,500 people blocking him. Libs can find him to be very tedious because his “my way or the highway” POV is different from their own.

          I knew Bluesky would be liberal. But I have to admit that I didn’t think it would be a lib playground where a lot of people would be as bad as the “We’re right - YOU ARE WRONG” hivemind redditor mindset of r/politics. Even liberal intellectuals like Adam Serwer say stuff that makes me laugh.

          Barack Obama presided over the largest expansion of the welfare state since Lyndon Johnson.

          https://bsky.app/profile/adamserwer.bsky.social/post/3kprmxazen42w

          In that thread he also acts as a Biden apologist on abortion as he always does. Sad.

        • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Deep down they know there is no such thing as true objectivity, but it’s a wonderful cudgel to keep “progressive” Dems in line.

      • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I hope libs get their veto proof majority and sitting president just so they can finally see that it won’t make a difference.

        • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Look, voters were smart enough about democracy to give the democrats a veto-proof majority. However - the filibuster still exists and Senators Asshole, Stymied, and Neolib just aren’t onboard with the plans to codify Roe. That’s the reality right now. But what Biden can do is sign an executive order that sets aspirational goals on abortion so that…

          • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            One thing republicans get right is their party are all on board with their stated goals. The only reason you wouldn’t be aiming for that is because you want to be controlled opposition so you can fundraise.

    • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can’t even show them the shifting narrative on things they believe in. Take masking during COVID for example. Fauchi was their God and he was caught lying how many times?