In this case, it is understandable that a child was born, and therefore the woman is entitled to a maintenance. But to force the institution of marriage onto people who do not believe in it seems to be the most regressive move. Gonna see how andhbhakts respond to this - are they gonna blame Nehru again?
It is kind of strange. In my country (NZ) we “force marriage” insofar as we have all the same laws for marriage and non-married people who have been together for 3 years, but maintenance isn’t normal, only child support, property division etc.
In this case, it is understandable that a child was born, and therefore the woman is entitled to a maintenance. But to force the institution of marriage onto people who do not believe in it seems to be the most regressive move. Gonna see how andhbhakts respond to this - are they gonna blame Nehru again?
It is kind of strange. In my country (NZ) we “force marriage” insofar as we have all the same laws for marriage and non-married people who have been together for 3 years, but maintenance isn’t normal, only child support, property division etc.
@velox_vulnus
@Achyu