A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices. Roku filed for the patent in August 2023 and it was published in November 2023, though it hasn’t yet been granted.

The technology described would detect whether content was paused in multiple ways—if the video being displayed is static, if there’s no audio being played, if a pause symbol is shown anywhere on screen, or if (on a TV with HDMI-CEC enabled) a pause signal has been received from some passthrough remote control. The system would analyze the paused image and use metadata “to identify one or more objects” in the video frame, transmit that identification information to a network, and receive and display a “relevant ad” over top of whatever the paused content is.

    • jkrtn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      9 months ago

      Roku has patented a way to ensure I don’t buy their junk.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              If only they made 60"+ monitors, I’d do the same. But since those don’t really exist, the options are:

              • prevent TV from accessing the Internet
              • get a commercial grade monitor - more expensive
              • projector - most seem to not have smart nonsense
              • pihole - may or may not work

              I’m going to try out the first, but allow certain accesses (Netflix and Disney+). If that works, I may not need to worry about the rest of the list.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah… I’ve been evaluating moving to Plex or Jellyfin.

      Kinda getting done with a lot of this smart stuff. The Monopolies are flexing and I don’t enjoy it.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just do it. I ripped our DVDs and put them on my NAS with minidlna configured, and I can now stream my stuff directly to my TV through the “Photos and Videos” app. My other TV has a Raspberry Pi running Kodi, so if my next TV doesn’t support dlna, I’ll just do that.

        Screw all of these companies and their predatory practices.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do it, it’s great. The NVidia Shield is a great client for it but is getting more and more adds on the homescreen. The are alternative loaders without the add you can put on it.

    • Threeme2189@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’ve got it the other way around. Roku sell their TVs at a loss. Buy one, use it as a dumb screen and help them go bankrupt faster.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I can’t imagine anyone that would leave the device plugged in after the first ad comes up. Pretty much anyone using such a device would also know how to unplug them. They clearly have other uses for that screen, so it’s not a total loss to keep it unplugged till the user can switch to a different brand.

      Ah it’s a Roku TV entirely. Reminds me of the Samsung TV ads

      Roku TV sets come with ads. Generally, these are restricted to Roku’s home and menu screens, its screensavers, and its first-party video channels, and once you start playing video, the only ads you’ll see are the ones from the service you’re streaming from. That said, Roku TVs have shown ads atop live TV before.

      Now, the company is apparently experimenting with ways to show ads over top of even more of the things you plug into your TV. A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads […]

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    9 months ago

    So we just ordered a new tv and just want the universe to know that Roku wasn’t even considered and this shit is why.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, yeah sure, but are the alternatives that much better in this respect? Which alternative non-ad-ridden, privacy-respecting smart tv would you recommend (or ended up buying)? Asking for my future tv choice…

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Samsung, but I’d rather report back when I see if it’s a mistake.

        I intend to keep using my AppleTV and hope that’s the end of it. But the Samsung was a process of elimination of Roku and LG via shitty experience with the WebOS on the work TV. If Tizen doesn’t stay out of the way then I’ll start playing router games.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m glad they patented it so that any of the products I actually buy won’t be able to do this

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think they’re erroneously stating that there will be so much technical information in the patent that it will be trivial to reverse engineer and remove from Roku products.

          Unfortunately that isn’t the case.

          • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ahh you’re right that’s probably what they meant, but yeah in that case every patented software would be hacked

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well, the idea is that anything and everything can be hacked. It’s just that the difficulty varies wildly; some being trivial whereas others are impossible until someone finds an exploit. If you’re working with a total black box, you’ll have to make many assumptions, which means that figuring stuff out may take a while. If there’s at least some documentation, such as a patent, you won’t have to guess absolutely everything. That doesn’t guarantee that it’s going to be easy. Maybe the patent doesn’t go into much technical detail, but still manages to describe the product in just enough legal detail that the company can sue anyone trying to come too close.

      • 667@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It will be licensed to manufacturers with advertising incentives and packaged into consumer electronics.

        Savvy electronics users will supply their own HDMI cables; this product will be for people who only understand enough to plug the ends between their box and the entertainment system.

        Hell, you might even see these cables being handed out for “free”, akin to the AOL disc days.

  • Nora
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    9 months ago

    The amount of ewaste they will be producing when they push that update. Should be against some environmental laws.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Bread and circuses. They’re gouging us on the bread and making the circuses inaccessible, these dipshits are practically begging for a red terror, by making the worst outcome still better than the ongoing white.

          If I were making their decisions for them; I’m not sure I could do much better at priming the populace for revolution.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Can’t we put these devices in some kind of dev mode and install software to stop this shit?

      I assume these devices run some kind of Linux kernel, with a stripped down Linux distro.

      • swab148@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem there is proprietary hardware blobs, no one’s made open-source drivers for any of the myriad TV manufacturers, each with their own OS.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          How do emby or jellyfin devs develop clients on roku?

          I would think, if you have that level of access, you could also stop or patch whatever OS services they run.

          Surely you can ssh into these devices right?

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The API for developing apps is absolutely open, but the OS isn’t. They’d give you some kind of development environment (like Android with Android studio), and a way to get logs out. The apps are often vetted by the platform like Android and iOS apps are, and they’d be able to override anything your app could do anyway.

            So think consoles, phones, tablets, etc. The OS is locked down, but you can develop apps for it.

            So probably no SSH access unless you find a backdoor or something. Your time is better spent buying something without that crap, like certain projectors, commercial displays, etc. They subsidize the cost of the TVs with that nonsense, so they’re going to prevent you from removing it.

      • 0x2d
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        roku generally puts a lot of effort into security

          • 0x2d
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            i’m trying to say that they’re pretty locked down

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    9 months ago

    Now, if only they would invent the exact opposite of this, I would buy it

    I want zero ads. Ever.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They did! Its called a pihole plus ublock origin plus piracy.

      You can’t buy it, only the hardware, but the software is all free.

      • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You can’t defend against ads with pihole if the ads server has the same address as content server

          • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            But with the risk of malware infection, unfortunately.

            When something is free, you’re the product.

            I’d advise to continue to use non-pirated products, but only from those companies, whose service you’re satisfied with.
            And if there’s none, don’t consume product at all. It’s not like movies are vital for you.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Vlc is pretty good, and I run a pretty strange distro. If I’m extra scared, I’ll use qubes or get a sacrifice machine.

              I think the poor having culture is important. Either art is important, or it Fucking isn’t. You seem to be arguing its the frivolity, not the substance and fruit of civilization.

              Video isnt my favorite medium, I have a lot of criticisms of it, but its still art, still precious. And so everyone deserves to have it.

              • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                And so everyone deserves to have it.

                And authors along with those, who maintain content distributing infrastructure, deserve to be rewarded for their labour.

                • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  But I can’t pay them. Its not generally an option. Have you seen the terms on their Fucking contracts?

                  Literally the closest I can get is wandering around Los Angeles giving money to people who look vaguely familiar or give off writerly vibes.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Have you heard about our new ad-blocking TVs?
      Thanks to our patented Ad-Away technology, they’re guaranteed to keep you free from all ads! Get yours now, Ad-Away subscriptions start at $49 a month!

      • quaddo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        2 years later, somewhere in their sales and marketing departments:

        “Hey, you know what would make us even more money?”

        “No, but do tell”

        “Advertising”

        “Genius - how is it nobody has ever thought of this before?”

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve just invented a way to never use a Roku product again, and I’ve chosen not to patent it.

    The process is this:

    1. Don’t buy anything from Roku anymore.
  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sounds like a class action lawsuit waiting to happen.
    Imagine that you pay for an ad free streaming service through your roku, like HBO for example. And now you have ads streaming over it?
    People will sue for a way to disable it over ad free paid content.
    Also, this will lead to way more pirating. People are sick of advertisements.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The best way to prevent ads is to figure out every way in which they can be served in the future, and patenting every one.

    And then do nothing with them.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    My TV set is like a dumb monitor: HDMI in, colorful image out, basta.

    Not even audio. And of course it does not get any internet connection. And I don’t feed it any caviar.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hopefully this ends up something they never actually do like that sony patent for ads that only go away if you call out the name of the product.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    if they patent this, it could be slightly good thing because it might prevent other companies from doing it

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        still, others will have to pay for it which might reduce how widely its used.

        Sometimes i wonder if it could be worth it to invent shit like this and patent it just so no one else cant do it themselves

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          Nah, they’ll patent it anyway and then tie you up in BS lawsuits over it. Fighting it will cost you way more than you’re willing to spend, so you’ll settle out of court for a licensing agreement that definitely doesn’t benefit you but makes the lawsuit go away.