InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agoGhoul rag tries to hide its ghoulishness with a friendly illustration.hexbear.netimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1209arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1208arrow-down1imageGhoul rag tries to hide its ghoulishness with a friendly illustration.hexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square145fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEelBolshevikism [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoBecause there’s a difference between doing something for financial incentive for food, and doing it for altruistic reasons or even cultural reasons.
minus-squarejsomaelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoThe idea is for kidney donation to be financially neutral. So you wouldn’t do this for financial gain. Currently, it’s financially net negative. Putting nitpicks with the specifics of their system aside, how is it wrong to take kidney donation from a financial negative to financially neutral?
minus-squareEelBolshevikism [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI don’t think 50k is financially neutral
minus-squarejsomaelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoIt surprises me as well that kidney donations cost the donor ~50k, but I guess that’s why I’m not an expert.
Because there’s a difference between doing something for financial incentive for food, and doing it for altruistic reasons or even cultural reasons.
The idea is for kidney donation to be financially neutral. So you wouldn’t do this for financial gain. Currently, it’s financially net negative.
Putting nitpicks with the specifics of their system aside, how is it wrong to take kidney donation from a financial negative to financially neutral?
I don’t think 50k is financially neutral
It surprises me as well that kidney donations cost the donor ~50k, but I guess that’s why I’m not an expert.