Just because some people have harvested organs in inhumane ways does not mean there is no ethical way to encourage people to donate kidneys.
Listen, I’m not saying the fox who guarded the hen house didn’t eat a few hens. I’m saying that this new fox (who looks shockingly similar to the old fox) can be trained to guard the hen house under a strict and reliable ethics code.
I could probably point to barbaric instances of praxis for any philosophy.
Damn. Almost like the entire privatized health care system is plagued with moral hazard. But since there’s nothing to be done, might as well turn a blind eye to yet another form of atrocity.
Why would somebody who wants to purchase a kidney want to donate a kidney in the first place?
It’s almost as though the end goal of a legal kidney market isn’t to facilitate simple familial donations at all.
I’m saying that this new fox can be trained to guard the hen house under a strict and reliable ethics code.
Yes that’s exactly what I’m saying.
It’s almost as though the end goal of a legal kidney market isn’t to facilitate simple familial donations at all.
Exactly! I want to see everyone who needs a kidney get one, and those who don’t want to give up their kidney not be coerced into it. There is an extremely large space of people who are (a) not in poverty and (b) never seriously considered donating their kidney, and this is a great way to tap into that pool.
Then reducing kidney failure is a critical first step. Improving the quality and accessibility of dialysis and comparable treatments would be a big second. Developing prosthetics would be up there, too. And figuring out how to economically incentivize carving organs out of desperate people would be way down the line.
I’m not denying that there are many ways to help with the problem. I reject the notion that “desperate” people will choose to sell their kidneys. The proposed system has several key components that prevents this from happening – in particular, tax credits are of little use to someone struggling to get by.
Listen, I’m not saying the fox who guarded the hen house didn’t eat a few hens. I’m saying that this new fox (who looks shockingly similar to the old fox) can be trained to guard the hen house under a strict and reliable ethics code.
Damn. Almost like the entire privatized health care system is plagued with moral hazard. But since there’s nothing to be done, might as well turn a blind eye to yet another form of atrocity.
It’s almost as though the end goal of a legal kidney market isn’t to facilitate simple familial donations at all.
Yes that’s exactly what I’m saying.
Exactly! I want to see everyone who needs a kidney get one, and those who don’t want to give up their kidney not be coerced into it. There is an extremely large space of people who are (a) not in poverty and (b) never seriously considered donating their kidney, and this is a great way to tap into that pool.
Then reducing kidney failure is a critical first step. Improving the quality and accessibility of dialysis and comparable treatments would be a big second. Developing prosthetics would be up there, too. And figuring out how to economically incentivize carving organs out of desperate people would be way down the line.
I’m not denying that there are many ways to help with the problem. I reject the notion that “desperate” people will choose to sell their kidneys. The proposed system has several key components that prevents this from happening – in particular, tax credits are of little use to someone struggling to get by.
As evidenced above, they could just as easily have them stolen.