• jsomae
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      According to the ModifyNOTA website, fewer than 1% of registered organ donors die in such a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested. Also, a living-donor kidney lasts twice as long on average as a deceased-donor kidney.

      Yes it would definitely help to make organ donation opt-out, and we should totally do that, but they’re saying this still wouldn’t be enough.

      • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        your first sentence has nothing to do with what i said because those people already registered. the stat you want is people who are not donors dying in a way that we could’ve used their organs but didn’t.

        • jsomae
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          that would presumably also be <1%, wouldn’t it?

            • jsomae
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I would make this assumption in this case.

              You think people who would opt-in register for organ donation would be less likely to die in a way compatible with kidney harvesting than others?

              I think it’s somewhat unlikely that whether or not someone registers to be an organ donor would affect how they are likely to die, but if it did, I would wager that registered organ donors are more likely to die in a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested than others. In any case, I doubt the difference is more than, say, a factor of 2.