• CableMonster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah I get it you keep a lot of words to convey very little meaning. I am fully able to use a micrometer, but you for some reason think its impossible, so you inability to do the task doesnt mean its impossible.

    You are the one that erroneously has been using infinity not me. If you have no explaination for the existence of humans its fine, but then dont use math to pretend its relevent to this situation.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You are the one that erroneously has been using infinity not me.

      I clearly explained why I was using infinite. This is the first time you have challenged my use of infinite. I eagerly await a rebuttal against my infinite argument.

      If you have no explaination for the existence of humans

      When did “existence of humans” enter the discussion? I thought we were discussing the existence of god(s). The probability of humans existing is 100%.

      but then dont use math to pretend its relevent to this situation.

      You brought math into the discussion, not I. I initially assumed you were speaking colloquially, and I responded with my “Pascal’s wager” answer. Only when you doubled down and demanded probability did I respond with my mathematical, 1/♾️ answer.

      If you don’t like the answer, ask a different question.

      • CableMonster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So long story short you will never be able to answer the original question? Too complicated?

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Indeed, it is a complex question.

          How many answers do you want? I’ve given you the colloquial answer; I’ve given you a reasoned, rational answer, and I’ve given you the simple, mathematical answer 1/♾️, which you recognize and acknowledge to be zero.

          I’ve answered you three separate times, respectfully and considerately, while ignoring your insults and denigration. I’ve patiently clarified and explained those answers, with reason and analogy, while you have mocked and belittled.

          I’m going to move on from your question now, and ask one of my own: as a person you have mocked and denigrated and insulted and belittled, what would you now have me know about religion in general, and/or yours in particular?

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I was just looking for a simple answer a human would give to another, but you seem to just keep writing long comments with midwit logic.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Isn’t that how it always goes? We look for simplicity, and find unexpected complexity.

              So, what would you have this midwit understand about religion?

              • CableMonster
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It was never even about religion, but you had such an inability to answer a simple question that it got lost in your feeling of being intelligent.