• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    As it stands now, it’s one of the most fun games I’ve played in a while. Currently setting my character up for a third playthrough

    • taanegl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just finished Phantom Liberty a couple of months ago, and that was my 3rd playthrough.

      If CDPR comes out with another expansion, I’ll just assume the second one is a banger as I prep my 4th playthrough.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Im the king of not finishing games so basically on third play through without even doing phantom yet or completing. I know. Its just the way I am. The first is actually a collection of starts while I evaluate options and decide how I want to play. The third is because I like the new skill system better so im abandoning the second.

    • Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wrapping up my third playthrough and I have my next one all plotted out. Gonna be a good one

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was a day 1 player on PC. It simply never had the technical issues to the same extent on PC, and it’s one of my fav games of the last… 15 years? And a good example of the differences in PC and console gaming.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Pretty much my experience with it, I should actually finish it someday. Ended up buying a 3070 just for ray tracing for this game and it looks gorgeous. I just love the cyberpunk setting and don’t want to see it actually end heh. Though that’s similar for a lot of my games.

    • 7heo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Denuvo is an excuse for mediocre devs. And an attack vector.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      They reportedly spent about $450 million making it, so not bad. Even better if that’s the gains after deducting the costs.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        And I assume a good chunk of they cost is an investment on the ip itself which will be definitely seeing more in the future. Glad they stuck through the whole shit show and made it work.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I hope so. The fact that they’re ditching their Red Engine in favor of UE5 gives me mixed feelings, as they’ll be starting over from scratch again for CP2 (although, I won’t be surprised if they create a custom asset import tool from RE4 to UE5). Using a mainstream engine also means trained devs aren’t as valuable versus trained devs on an in-house engine, which for a publicly traded company isn’t always a good thing. Anyway, hopefully I’m wrong to worry and using a much more mainstream engine means they’ll be able to nail the sequel and then some since finding experienced devs will be easier.

          • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I partly disagree on the train staff. You still need experienced/capable staff working on it as they can modify the engine quite a bit. If they bring someone in in the middle development that person may have a quicker bring up if they are already familiar with the engine than if they were using an in house engine.

            The idea that before long you may only have a few game engines in new games is sad though.

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, that’s what I was trying to imply. It’ll be easier to find talent and replace people as needed, but that can also be a bad thing when you have penny pinching upper management where talented senior devs are let go in favor of cheaper, inexperienced devs.

              The idea that before long you may only have a few game engines in new games is sad though.

              I completely agree and it’s something I’ve been a bit disheartened with over the last decade as UE and Unity become more and more ubiquitous. At least many Japanese studios still persist in making their own engines.

      • SuperSpecialNickname
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        With all that money they could have had in the game everything they promised in the gameplay trailer.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You’d think.

          But meeting deadlines and achieving what is planned isn’t a matter of money.

          That’s on whoever is steering the ship not fucking it up. And they fucked it up.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    the article is not good about differentiating between total and revenue but the chart has revenue so im assuming this is after expenses.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The op probably means landed revenue after platform fees.

        After what most people would call expenses (Payroll, rent, services costs) is called EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization).

        After removing all that also, is profit.

  • umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    they shipped a broken game and are now asking for more cash for the complete game.

    i mean phantom liberty has the shit they promised and implied would be on the base game, but costs more money on top of the game i already bought. so i see how their “success” could have come to be.

    i got mad, pirated the expansion, and promised myself never to fall for this bullshit again.

    • misterundercoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is disingenuous because the 2.0 fixes are all available in the base game, and don’t require buying the DLC. It’s fair to complain that the base game was broken at launch, but there’s no need to spread misinformation.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        a lot of what they promised for the base game is in the paid expansion

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        a lot of that additional content was promised/implied to be in the base game

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          they must have promise/implied a boat load as the game before the dlc is pretty massive. 3 arcs that merge into the story line, gigs and mcpd stuff, the various side quests that add up to more than the main stuff overall. I have seen many a game launch and complete and never have more than what 2077 has.

    • pixel_prophet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Eh it’s not a complete shit show but it’s a stretch that any of it delivered what was promised.

      The different life paths were laughably shallow. Quests / writing and the whole vibe of the game are pretty cheesy compared to the witcher series.

      It was trying to be too much like GTA for all the wrong reasons I would have preferred a smaller more fleshed out world with more explorable interiors.

      There were bad decisions made during development that could not be fixed with a small expansion.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        yeah the lifepaths was really nuanced and would be hard to notice. two basic effects. more to less money is corpo, city, country. Your relationships with jackie dom to sub is the reverse (I could not think of any words for it but basically if your country jackie needed you more and if your corpo you needed him more). There might be an effect on street cred but I did not notice. Would make sense for some street cred bonus to city start.